Habololy Forum

Habololy Concepts => Domain => Topic started by: Asinjin on February 16, 2012, 12:20:57 PM

Title: Alternate Domain feat
Post by: Asinjin on February 16, 2012, 12:20:57 PM
Alternate Domain (Divine)

Although each deity has a selection of domains his clerics may have, you have found a reason to expand on the deity’s domains and expand the influence of the deity.

Prerequisite: Full access to a clerical domain; must be taken when access to the domain is first gained.

Benefit: You may select a domain not normally allowed by your deity and use it as one of your domains.

Special: The DM must be consulted and the new domain must fit the deity.  The domain must be one that already exists on Habololy.
Title: Re: Alternate Domain feat
Post by: whitesword on February 19, 2012, 10:31:04 PM
Do all clerics gain proficiency in their power's favored weapon?
Title: Re: Alternate Domain feat
Post by: Asinjin on February 19, 2012, 10:35:24 PM
Yes
Title: Re: Alternate Domain feat
Post by: Windblade on February 19, 2012, 11:08:14 PM
Is that a house rule or a WotC rule. Seems kind of powerful but not sure.
Title: Re: Alternate Domain feat
Post by: Asinjin on February 20, 2012, 09:30:33 AM
It is a house rule.
Title: Re: Alternate Domain feat
Post by: whitesword on February 20, 2012, 09:49:21 AM
Right, its an import from 2Ed. 
Title: Re: Alternate Domain feat
Post by: whitesword on February 26, 2012, 09:29:40 PM
As we have sort of adopted this for Solaris and Ajax I wanted to throw this out there as a house rule:

When casting any domain spell that uses a material component with a cost in Gold Pieces the cleric may instead sacrifice experience points at the same rate used for the creation of magic items.

I think this is a good rule for both game and meta reasons. First It reflects the special nature of the domain spells relation to the deity's power/area of influence. Second it makes the Devotee, who only gets these spells but gets to cast them numerous times, more workable.

If you don't want to make this a feature for clerics I suggest we include it when we revise the Devotee
Title: Re: Alternate Domain feat
Post by: Asinjin on February 26, 2012, 09:32:47 PM
I am okay with making it a house rule for domain spells.  Thoughts?
Title: Re: Alternate Domain feat
Post by: Asinjin on February 29, 2012, 01:15:30 PM
Thoughts on the last question and also...

Should we list the possible alternate domain(s) that can be taken by a cleric with this feat?